Skip to main content

POD Engagement Deliverables Checklist

Purpose: Master list of all artifacts and deliverables required across a POD engagement lifecycle. Use this as a tracking checklist for delivery and as a template for future engagements.

Framework references: Doc 01 (Charter), Doc 03 (Planning & Estimation), Doc 04 (Agile Delivery), Doc 05 (Client Communication), Doc 06 (SDLC), Doc 14 (Security), Doc 17 (QA & Testing), Doc 19 (Documentation)


How to Use This Document

  • For the current engagement: Track status of each artifact as the engagement progresses
  • For new engagements: Copy this checklist, tailor the owner and timeline columns, mark items as Not Applicable where the framework allows tailoring
  • Non-negotiable items are marked with (NN) -- these cannot be tailored away per Doc 01, Section 5.1

Status Legend

StatusMeaning
---Not started
In ProgressBeing drafted
In ReviewDraft complete, under review
DoneSigned off / delivered
N/ANot applicable for this engagement (document why in Tailoring Record)

Phase 0: Discovery

Goal: Shape the engagement, validate feasibility, produce the Discovery Output Pack (Doc 03, Section 3.4)

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
1Discovery Call AnswersPOD Lead--Done
2Use Case CanvasPOD Lead + PMDoc 03, Sec 3.4Done
3Data Feasibility ReportData EngineerDoc 03, Sec 3.4Done
4POD CharterPM + POD LeadDoc 01, Sec 6In Review
5Architecture SketchPOD LeadDoc 03, Sec 3.4Done
6Evaluation PlanPOD Lead + QADoc 03, Sec 3.4Done
7Risk Register (initial)PMDoc 03, Sec 6Done
8Engagement PlanPMDoc 03, Sec 7Done
9Sprint PlanPM + POD LeadDoc 04Done
10Threat Model (initial) (NN)Governance EngineerDoc 14Done
11Engagement Tailoring RecordPOD Lead + PMDoc 01, Sec 5.1Done

Discovery Exit Gate (Doc 03, Section 3.5):

  • All 7 Discovery Output Pack artifacts present and internally reviewed
  • Client sponsor sign-off on success criteria and Evaluation Plan thresholds
  • Architecture Sketch reviewed (no blocking concerns)
  • Threat model in flight (initial threat surface identified)
  • Sprint Zero / Sprint 1 readiness confirmed

Phase 1: Sprint 1 -- Walking Skeleton + Eval Harness

Goal: End-to-end working slice (M1) and operational evaluation harness (M2)

Engineering Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
12ADRs (Architecture Decision Records)POD LeadDoc 19---
13Data ingestion pipelineData EngineerDoc 06---
14Vector store + retrieval moduleData Engineer + AI EngineerDoc 06---
15Classification moduleAI EngineerDoc 06---
16Action recommendation moduleAI EngineerDoc 06---
17Response drafting moduleAI EngineerDoc 06---
18Confidence scoringAI EngineerDoc 06---
19UI (extension / sidebar / web app)POD LeadDoc 06---
20Eval harness (NN)QA + POD LeadDoc 17---
21Golden dataset (initial) (NN)QADoc 17---

Process Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
22Sprint 1 status reportPMDoc 05---
23Sprint 1 demoPOD Lead + PMDoc 04, Sec 8---

Milestone Gates

M1 -- Walking Skeleton:

  • One input → one classification → one retrieval → one output, deployed to dev
  • Architecture ADRs documented

M2 -- Eval Harness Operational:

  • Golden dataset committed (minimum 20 cases)
  • Automated scoring running
  • Baseline metrics published against Evaluation Plan thresholds

Phase 2: Sprint 2 -- MVP + Hardening + Handover

Goal: Feature-complete MVP (M3), all eval gates passing, security reviewed, knowledge transfer ready

Engineering Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
24Feedback loop (agent rates/edits, system learns)AI EngineerDoc 06---
25Guardrails (profanity, misuse prevention)AI Engineer + GovernanceDoc 14---
26UI polish + confidence indicatorsPOD LeadDoc 06---
27Synthetic eval set (1000 questions)QA + AI EngineerDoc 17---

Evaluation & Quality Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
28Final eval results (NN)QADoc 17---
29Sample outputs (10-12 across categories)QADoc 03---
30Security review sign-off (NN)Governance EngineerDoc 14---

Documentation Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
31Architecture document (final)POD LeadDoc 19---
32Productionization notePOD LeadClient brief---
33Model cardAI Engineer + POD LeadDoc 19---
34Knowledge transfer packagePOD Lead + PMDoc 19---

Process Deliverables

#ArtifactOwnerFramework RefStatus
35Sprint 2 status reportPMDoc 05---
36Final demo + walkthroughPOD Lead + PMDoc 04---
37Engagement summaryPOD Lead + PMDoc 19---

Milestone Gates

M3 -- MVP Feature-Complete:

  • All MVP scope implemented and integrated
  • Eval metrics at or above target thresholds
  • Security review completed, no blocking findings
  • Adversarial eval cases run

Delivery Gate:

  • All documentation delivered
  • Knowledge transfer complete
  • Client walkthrough conducted
  • Codebase ready for handover

Recurring Artifacts (Every Sprint)

These are produced every sprint, not just once.

ArtifactOwnerCadenceFramework Ref
Weekly status emailPMWeeklyDoc 05
Weekly call (Google Meet)PM + POD LeadWeeklyDoc 05
Sprint demoPOD Lead + PMPer sprintDoc 04, Sec 8
Eval results deltaQAPer sprintDoc 17
Updated risk registerPMPer sprintDoc 03
Decision log entriesPOD Lead + PMAs neededDoc 19
Updated ADRsPOD LeadAs neededDoc 19
Sprint retro outcomesPOD LeadPer sprintDoc 04

Non-Negotiable Artifacts (Never Tailored Away)

Per Doc 01, Section 5.1 -- these are required in every engagement regardless of size, timeline, or client preferences:

#Non-NegotiableArtifacts That Fulfill It
1Threat modeling and secrets managementThreat Model (#10), Security Review (#30)
2Evaluation before productionEvaluation Plan (#6), Eval Harness (#20), Golden Dataset (#21), Final Eval Results (#28)
3Versioned data and promptsAll prompts, data, and configs in version control
4Audit trail for AI decisionsLogging in the application, Decision Log
5Incident response readinessRunbooks (in Knowledge Transfer Package #34)

Ownership Summary by Role

POD Lead (Amit)

Primary: #1, #5, #12, #19, #26, #31, #32 Contributing: #2, #4, #6, #9, #23, #33, #34, #36, #37

AI Engineer (Atharva)

Primary: #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #24, #25 Contributing: #27, #33

Data Engineer (Nancy)

Primary: #3, #13 Contributing: #14

QA (Nishka)

Primary: #20, #21, #27, #28, #29 Contributing: #6

Governance Engineer (Shubham)

Primary: #10, #25, #30 Contributing: #6

Implementation Manager (Shivani)

Primary: #4, #7, #8, #9, #11, #22, #35 Contributing: #2, #23, #34, #36, #37


Adapting This Checklist for New Engagements

When starting a new client engagement:

  1. Copy this document as the starting point
  2. Fill in the Owner column with actual team member names
  3. Review each item against the engagement scope:
    • If the engagement is shorter (e.g., 2-week spike), mark non-critical items as N/A
    • If longer (e.g., 12-week build), add items from the extended framework inventory (Doc 12: MLOps, Doc 18: Operations)
  4. Never mark Non-Negotiable (NN) items as N/A -- these require Engineering Leadership approval to waive (Doc 01, Section 5.1)
  5. Record all tailoring decisions in the Engagement Tailoring Record (#11)
  6. Add engagement-specific deliverables requested by the client that aren't in this template

Common Additions by Engagement Type

Engagement TypeTypical Additional Artifacts
Production deploymentRunbooks, on-call rotation, rollback plan, monitoring dashboards, cost projection
Regulated industryCompliance mapping, responsible AI checklist, governance log, audit trail design
Multi-teamCross-team interface contracts, shared API specs, integration test suite
Data-heavyData lineage docs, PII handling policy, data quality reports, refresh schedules
Long-running (12+ weeks)Monthly steering committee pack, model version registry, drift detection setup